Moscow supports Kim Jong-un

Russia claims it is willing to link divided Korea with energy pipelines and electricity grids. But its economic relations with North Korea indicate a return to the Cold War politics of the past.

In 1948, Stalin sponsored the creation of the DPRK in the northern half of the Korean Peninsula. The following year, Prime Minister Kim Il-sung travelled to Moscow to collect a 2 percent interest loan of 212 million Soviet roubles. Some of this money was allocated to build the centrally-planned economy, but much of the funding was used to fuel the war effort against South Korea between 1950 and 1953. After the end of the disastrous Korean War, the Soviet Union continued to help the North with the rebuilding of its cities, industry and infrastructure.

Even during the Sino-Soviet ideological split in the 1960s and ‘70s, Moscow tried to curry favor with Pyongyang throughout its confrontation with Beijing. As a bastion of communism in the Far East that directly faced U.S. troops on the Korean Peninsula, North Korea successfully managed to squeeze money from both of its allies during the Cold War. But when the iron curtain fell in the early 1990s, the Democrats in Moscow swiftly recognized Seoul and demanded the payment of debts from Pyongyang.

The timing could not have been worse for North Korea. Most of the country’s capital had been wasted on non-productive sectors, an oversized army, ideological campaigns and extravagant monuments. All that North Korea could offer to Russia as payment-in-kind was a humble list of export goods that did not exceed pickles, cigarettes and ginseng-based medicines. With the death of Kim Il-sung in 1994 and natural disasters in 1995, the North’s floundering industrial and agricultural sectors collapsed, causing the deaths of an estimated 3 million people in three consecutive years of famine.

South Korea’s Sunshine Policy (1998-2008) and growing humanitarian aid from other regional neighbors permitted North Korea to weather the “Arduous March,” finally showing some signs of recovery in the early 2000s. It was around this time that Moscow once again raised the issue of the North’s debt, which had already been calculated at nearly $8 billion. Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chairman Kim Jong-il visited each other twice to discuss this and other bilateral issues, creating an impression that the debt would be written off rather than paid in full.

In August last year, at the last summit between North Korean leader Kim Jong-il and Russian President Medvedev, the parties agreed to move forward on a proposal to build a pipeline that would be capable of transporting Russian natural gas to both Koreas. Simultaneously, North Korea and Russia signed a protocol calling for economic cooperation between the two countries. But international observers immediately questioned the feasibility of such a project in the midst of an ongoing inter-Korean conflict.

The oil markets of the last 10 years have been favorable to Russia, allowing the country to save hundreds of billions of petro-dollars from the sale of energy-rich natural resources to its neighbors. Expecting an impoverished North Korea to pay off a Soviet-era debt, which today amounts to $11 billion, would be unrealistic. Last week the Russian government agreed to discount 90 percent of the debt owed by its destitute but stubborn ally. The remaining $1.1 billion was promised to be invested in joint Russian-North Korean projects, particularly in education, medical and energy sectors.

One may be surprised by the timing and generosity of the deal. Despite promises of a new era of strength and prosperity, this year saw the DPRK at odds with old evils. The coldest winter and the driest summer in decades have dashed its expectations for a proper harvest. The embarrassment of a faulty rocket launch in April was compounded by the withdrawal of U.S. food-aid and international condemnation. The hyper-inflation of the North Korean currency and a continuing energy crisis are not the propitious signs of effective governance by the newest leader of the Kim dynasty. Is Russia trying to help Kim Jong-un consolidate political power and overcome mounting economic difficulties?

This year Russia experienced the return of Kremlin veteran Vladimir Putin to the presidential seat. Although he is associated with political reaction and is concerned by the prospect of “color revolutions” at home, Russia is desperately running out of friends on the international stage. With Libya and Syria having already become victims of the “Arab Spring,” Moscow is scrambling to buttress dictatorial regimes in its vicinity. Anti-Americanism and curtailed political freedoms once again have become the primary criteria in gaining Kremlin sympathies. Belarus, Iran, the countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and now North Korea, have all received special treatment from the increasingly anti-Western Russia.

Whereas Beijing was once the only power that remained content to sink trillions of yuan into North Korea simply to prop up a buffer state ruled by an anachronistic regime, Moscow is now returning to an East Asia policy that echoes the Cold War. Instead of reprimanding Kim Jong-un for his provocative actions and belligerent rhetoric, Putin is dumping trillions of taxpayers’ roubles into supporting a friendly dictator. Moscow’s empty promises to persuade North Korea to end its nuclear weapons program are in clear conflict with Pyongyang’s determination to remain a self-proclaimed nuclear power for the sake of its regime survival.

Northeast Asia is again becoming a theater for large-scale geo-strategic games where powerful empires scrum in a noxious struggle for domination, leaving 75 million Koreans in a state of anxious suspense. Given the current situation, hopes for peace and reconciliation remain untenable. <The Korea Times/Leonid Petrov>

*Leonid A. Petrov is a lecturer in Korean studies at the University of Sydney, Australia.

news@theasian.asia